| From | Message |
Posted by jstevens1 uskidscompute.com
7/08/2008 02:48:19 Play online chess | Subject: Retarded Development
Message: Usually one can associate the above with beginners. However, intermediate players can also fall into this trap. I, Joanne with a rating of 1691 has just fallen into one! I have annotated a game which I have just resigned against Ionadowman called An Expert Lesson in Development. You will see just how I got punished for this.
I hope you readers will find this helpful.
Have a nice day.
Bye for now.
Joanne
|
Posted by savage4731 uskidscompute.com
7/08/2008 14:09:34 Play online chess | Development
Message: I dont think development was your problem. In fact, I dont see where you were ever behind in development. I think putting your pieces on the wrong squares and blocking in your bishop were your biggest problems at least early on.
|
Posted by ketchuplover uskidscompute.com
7/12/2008 13:23:43 Play online chess |
Message: Is there a link somewhere to the game? tia
|
Posted by hubtom uskidscompute.com
7/12/2008 15:49:18 Play online chess | game
Message:
gameknot.com
|
Posted by doctor_knight uskidscompute.com
7/16/2008 19:50:09 Play online chess | savage4731
Message: isn't that what retarded development is? blocking pieces in and developing so that your pieces lack coordination?
|
Posted by lighttotheright uskidscompute.com
7/16/2008 20:43:37 Play online chess |
Message: I don't think 8. ... Bxf4 was a good idea at all! It only helps white. That was definitely an over-zealous exchange. I won't call that retard development though! It is a bad exchange that gave white more time to deploy his knight better.
Black missed an opportunity for a very slight advantage on move 12. ... Qxe2 instead. If you're Black in the Dutch, you are supposed to attack. If you don't attack, it is hard to defend.
|
Posted by savage4731 uskidscompute.com
7/17/2008 02:58:54 Play online chess | doctor_knight
Message: I would assume by "retarded" she meant slow. Blocking pieces impedes development but isnt slow development in and of itself. If you look at the position after black's 10th move her development is almost finished. Just the rook and bishop need to come into the game. Normally I would call that pretty quick development.
I've never played either side of the dutch but locking all your pawns on light squares and putting the knight on the only square the bishop can move to isnt right is it?
|
Posted by loreta uskidscompute.com
7/17/2008 04:31:14 Play online chess | ? lighttotheright
Message: IMHO, position of Black at move 8 is quite good.
So, lighttotheright, what would you propose insteed of 8. ... Bxf4? I see only two possibilities: 8. ... Be7 or 8. ... b6
I added a couple of notes into annotation (including about that) to beginning of that game:
gameknot.com/annotation.pl/an-expert-lesson-in-development.pl?gm=17250
---
I aggree with Ion, that the main problem was not Black's development, but no solution for c8 Bishop. To find a place to this Bishop is a cornerstone in the Dutch.
|
Posted by lighttotheright uskidscompute.com
7/17/2008 04:38:06 Play online chess |
Message: I saw that note in the game annotation. I have to disagree that 8. ... Bxf4 was good. It simply was not fatal. Just because you can get away with a move does not make it good. Nor is it good simply because a high rated player has used it in the past.
|
Posted by loreta uskidscompute.com
7/17/2008 04:48:05 Play online chess | yes, lighttotheright
Message: Yes, I fully agree! 8. ... Bxf4!? is not very good but it isn't fatal too...
Anyway, what proposal would be :)
|
Chess news:
In High-Stakes Chess, Rivals Can Suddenly Become Allies -- When it comes to strange bedfellows, politics has nothing on chess. The sight last week of Garry Kasparov at a New York City fund-raiser for his longtime rival Anatoly Karpov, who is running for president of the World Chess Federation, was odd enough. Then there was Viswanathan Anand’s revelation in an interview that Kasparov had given him advice and looked over some of his openings before and during his victorious world chess championship match against Veselin Topalov. Kasparov and Anand also have a history of rivalry, and they competed for the world chess championship in 1995, a match that Kasparov won. Kasparov once even dismissed Anand as a “coffeehouse player.” ...
Kamsky and Shulman Win and Will Play for U.S. Title -- They’ll play one game for the title. And if it ends in a draw, they’ll play some more. Gata Kamsky and Yuri Shulman will square off Monday in a game that could determine the United States Chess Champion. Kamsky and Shulman are tied for the lead of the chess championship after both won Sunday. Kamsky, the No. 2 seed, was expected to be a factor in the tournament. Sunday, he beat Alexander Onischuk, the No. 3 seed, in the process breaking Onischuk’s 49-game unbeaten streak in U.S. Chess Championships. It was a tense contest, where neither player had much of an edge for most of the game. According to the Web site of the chess championship, Kamsky even offered ...
Eljanov Easily Wins Final Chess Grand Prix -- The last Grand Prix tournament ended somewhat anticlimactically on Monday in Astrakhan, Russia, as Pavel Eljanov of Russia easily secured first place. (He had wrapped up at least a tie with a round to go.) The real drama was over who would gain enough points to earn a spot in the Candidates matches or tournament, as the format has still not been settled on. (Nor has a time or a place been announced, which is par for the course with the World Chess Federation.) With a tie for second, Teimour Radjabov of Azerbaijan finished second in the six-tournament series behind Levon Aronian of Armenia. Radjabov, who was tied for second place in the Grand Prix before the chess ...
|