Play chess online, chess teams, online games, board games, free online chess games, chess games, chess games database, chess clubs, chess puzzles, free chess online, chess league and more...

Tags: online chess, chess online, online chess, play chess, online chess, online chess, online backgammon

Chess Forum
uskidscompute.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>

From	Message
Posted by doctor_knight uskidscompute.com 3/21/2006 12:36:26 Play online chess	Subject: tactical help Message: I have a sound understanding of the game of chess. I personally think that I could coach someone to a certain extent to understand how to win. The problem is that I think my tactical vision is lousy. I usualy don't have trouble puzzling out a complex combination if it involves whatever plan I am following, but I always tend to make other tactical blunders that destroy my chances. Maybe my problem is that I haven't developed the ability to see my opponent's plan, but I think it is mainly just that I am tactically lazy. I fall into traps (especially against the computer) alot and blunder away material. I always can evaluate how the opponent will beat me, but it's always too late. It may have something to do with the fact that I think I'm mentally worn out from college English on top of my High School English and other classes, but I believe there is still a problem with my tactical vision. Maybe I need to start making sure that I know what each and every piece on the board is capable of each move or something. Any tips from experienced players? Anyone else having the same problems? I think my rating would significantly improve by fixing this. (Right now I would probably be rated over 1300, but I lost my last few games due to time outs. It's still my fault that I lost, but it wasn't because of my chess playing ability)
Posted by alberlie uskidscompute.com 3/21/2006 13:20:59 Play online chess	no offence... Message: ... but I would think that probably noone below FM-Level can say of himself that he has a sound understanding of the _game_ of chess. Buy a tactics-book or sign up at -> chess.emrald.net and start improving your tactical vision. That might help for starters :o)
Posted by mattdw uskidscompute.com 3/21/2006 13:45:59 Play online chess	I agree.. Message: I agree with aberlie, buy a tactics book (I recommend either Chernev & Reinfeld's Winning chess or Yasser Sierawan's Winning Chess Tactics) they will tell you why things are a good idea which will help give you the confidence you are doing things for the right reasons. And again, you cannot go wrong with -> chess.emrald.net I have found it has done wonders for my tactical ability and my playing strength especially since that is all my game is really based on currently (since I have yet to study much else, I have the strategic vision of a deceased turkey). But this is no bad thing! Every player I have beaten who is rated higher than me I have done so through one or more tactical moves which would suggest to me that tactics can take you quite far before the the finer details of the game really need to be considered. (feel free to disagree with me on this! :p) Secondly I would advise challenging some higher rated opponents, you are doing yourself no favours by almost always challenging people rated equal or lower than yourself at your level. All that you will gain from doing this is a short term ratings boost. In the long run you will gain a lot more by playing higher rated people who will punish you for your mistakes. The sooner you are happier to lose and learn something valuable than win and learn nothing, the quicker you will become a better player. ——— Carlsen Secures at Least a Tie for First at Kingâ€™s Chess Tournament — All three games were drawn in the penultimate round of the Kingâ€™s Chess Tournament in Romania on Thursday, which assures Magnus Carlsen, the top seed, of at least a share of the title. Carlsen now leads with 6.5 points, one point ahead of Boris Gelfand of Israel and two points ahead of Teimour Radjabov of Azerbaijan. None of the games on Thursday was a barn burner, though Carlsenâ€™s opponent, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu of Romania did employ a surprising chess opening: the Schliemann Defense. The Schliemann, which was first used in the 19th century, is almost never played anymore, particularly in top-level competition as the conventional thinking is that White can almost always get ...
Posted by misato uskidscompute.com 3/21/2006 22:35:55 Play online chess	Doc, Message: I totally agree with your self-analysis concerning the tactical point - though I haven´t had a single look at any of your games, just in general: For the great majority of chess players (up to 2000 GK-rating? - my personal estimation) the tactics versus strategy relation is between 70-30 and 100-0, the lower the rating the higher the tactical importance. Unfortunately most books are written by experts with a 50-50 percentage or lower; it is okay what they write, but it is hard to come down to our level. I made good experience with playing a lot of free OTB games (blitz or 30 minutes maximum) and transferring this experience to a few important games, OTB as well as CC. Intensive OTB-games (including post-mortem analysis with the opponent and/or a coach) and slow CC-games with tons of time for each move provide a better view of the whole board than 50+ games at GK where I can´t remember position and pattern of game#17 after my moves in games #18-43. I am no GM who is able to play such a lot of games in an good way, therefore I prefer 4-8 games with deliberated and re-deliberated moves and a feeling for the development of those games (= history of the current position). Alberlie´s and Matt´s advices are fine, though. I don´t know the recommended book and site, but they are worth a try. And playing better opponents is a good idea as well, but you should invest time to play those games well. It is too easy to beat lower rated opponents just by waiting for blunders, but you should be aware that this is exactly the higher rated opponents´ view, too ... Good luck! ——— The Catalan chess opening: what would Topalov do? — The Bulgarian is an aggressive chess player. But the Catalan doesn't bring about a quick victory. RB When you see that the chess player with the move is Topalov you immediately start thinking tactics â€“ quiet, careful improvement is not the Bulgarian's style. So, using the player's identity as a clue, and with an additional hint provided by the absence of a knight on f6, my eye is immediately drawn to 1 Ng5, with the twin threats of 2 Qxh7 mate and 2 Bxb7. Let's have a look at how Black might counter: 1...g6 might not be as bad as it first appears. After 2 Bxb7 Rb8 both the bishop and knight are en prise. Here I would be tempted to ...
Posted by doctor_knight uskidscompute.com 3/22/2006 09:20:52 Play online chess	thanks Message: just to aviod any misunderstanding, I didn't mean a deep thorough knowledge of chess by a sound understanding. I guess my word choice was wrong, but I just mean that I understand the dynamics of the game. I quite soundly understand how things work and such. My knowledge isn't that deep though. My general opening play skills are pretty good, but my knowledge of opening theory is quite bad and so on. I understand how to do stuff and such, I just don't have the intimate knowledge of the game that a master has. Anyway. I have read books about tactics and have solved tons of combinations. My ability to analyse and execute tactics is pretty good I think (at least for my general rating), but alot of times I'm just lazy and don't care about what my opponent is doing tactically, or I don't see various little traps and stuff. I think that maybe I make moves too fast. Maybe if I catch myself before I make a move and visualize the entire board after the move instead of just my plan or whatever I wouldn't make mistakes like that. What exactly is chess.emerald.net? Would any of you care to play (as a start at playing better people) me and maybe see if you see anything about my problem? (I play like OTB because I don't really have much time to check chess recources and I like doing stuff by myself rather then with help) ——— Chess Hustling, a Look Back — Part of the fabric of night life in New York City, particularly during the summer, are the street chess games. Dozens of chess players in places like Washington Square Park, Union Square and St. Nicholas Avenue and 141st Street are up all night, taking on all comers, for a few dollars a game. The games are fast and gritty and often peppered with non-stop and colorful banter. Chess hustling has been around for many years, but how and when did it begin? In 2007, a hustler named Kenny, who went by the name Little Daddy, and who had been hustling on the street for decades, said that the guy who started it all was a man named Bobby Haywood. He said that Haywood appeared one day in ...
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 3/22/2006 12:06:59 Play online chess	doctor_knight... Message: ...have you been looking at the 'novice nook' threads? They're up to #9 now. What is discussed on these may be of some assistance to you in developing the tactical awareness you are looking for. The parent articles are worthwhile reads anyhow. Cheers, Ion ——— Carlsen Express Rolls on — The Kingâ€™s Chess Tournament in Romania is turning into an exhibition. Magnus Carlsen, the Norwegian chess grandmaster who is the worldâ€™s No. 1 player, beat Teimour Radjabov of Azerbaijan on Monday, to run his winning streak in the chess event to four games. He leads the tournament with 5.5 points after seven rounds. Boris Gelfand of Israel, the only player not to lose to Carlsen so far, is in second place with 4.5 points, after beating Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu of Romania on Monday. Carlsen and Gelfand play Tuesday. Though Carlsen has won the last three chess tournaments he has played (Amber, Corus and the London Classic), the last time he was on a roll like he is now was ...
Posted by doctor_knight uskidscompute.com 3/22/2006 12:26:12 Play online chess	Message: Also, here is a game I played were I did some stupid things (I'm black here): 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. a3 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. h3 Be6 7. Nf3 Be7 8. Bb5 O-O 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. Ne5 Qd6 11. Bf4 c5 12. dxc5 Qxc5 13. O-O Rad8 14. Na4 Qb5 15. Nc3 Qxb2 16. Na4 Qb5 17. Nc3 Qa5 18. Ne2 Bxa3 19. Nc6 Qc5 20. Ned4 (here I accidentaly timed out) I was pressing for an advantage when I shouldn't have on move 18. It was a stupid way to lose a piece. Also it seamed like I was in a position prone to tactical errors. ——— Carlsen Sprints Ahead at King's Tournament — With a little good fortune, Magnus Carlsen is on a tear. Carlsen, the top seed, won his third game in a row at the Kingâ€™s Chess Tournament in Romania on Sunday. This time, his victim was Ruslan Ponomariov of Ukraine, who was winning for most of the game. But then he blundered (23 Rf2? instead of 23 Kh1) allowing Carlsen to turn the tables. He was also a bit fortunate in Round 5, on Saturday, when he beat Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu of Romania. In that game, Nisipeanu had a small advantage, but Carlsen employed a nice feint and Nisipeanu took the bait (17 Qd5, he should have played 17 Nd5), after which his position was very difficult. Carlsen, a Norwegian, now has 4.5 points and ...
Posted by misato uskidscompute.com 3/22/2006 13:24:26 Play online chess	A typical example Message: As you already wrote in your initial post: "tactical laziness" which leads to a fatal carelessness concerning the opponent´s possibilities. Your 11th move already meets those conditions. Always ask yourself "what may my opponent have in mind, especially with his/her latest move?". 11. Bf4 has an obvious threat: it attacks your Queen indirectly, just by moving the Ne5 elsewhere. Of course, the discovering move has to take care that the Bf4 currently is unprotected, but 12. Ng6 is fine - you lose a rook for a knight, a very bad deal! Try to become more suspicious!
Posted by johnrowell uskidscompute.com 3/22/2006 23:00:05 Play online chess	18... Bxa3 Message: Yes, misato is right. Any piece that's on a direct line with your King or Queen should be checked carefully on each move, especially if there is only one knight in the way that can happily jump to a threatening square as in 12. Ng6. Also, 18.... Bxa3 is very dubious. Consider that by playing that move, you are immediately pinning your bishop to your queen. It's going to take you two moves to extricate yourself from that situation, one to move the queen whilst still protecting the bishop, and another to then move the hanging bishop. All that for a miserly pawn, in a very open position that is full of tactical possibilities where your opponent probably has possibilities while you waste those two moves. In fact, after he plays 19. Nc6 I can't understand why he doesn't just take your rook on move 20. I'm rubbish at tactics too, so you have my sympathy. I put my poor tactics down to only playing for a limited number of years, starting late in life, and lazyness.
Posted by thebrand uskidscompute.com 3/23/2006 10:34:02 Play online chess	Suspicion Message: Yes, Misato's words - "Try to become more suspicious!" - is a fine maxim. As Elvis once sang, "suspicion...torments my mind". No move is made without repercussions (however subtle) somewhere on the board. It takes as much (perhaps more) tactical imagination to prevent an opponents' manoervres as to initiate your own. If before each move you make a quick survey of some common tactical themes - pins, forks, skewers, underprotected or hanging pieces, dicovered checks, back rank fallibility - then you should at least give yourself a puncher's chance...