Play chess online, board games, chess puzzles, free chess online, chess games, chess teams, chess league, chess clubs, online games, free online chess games, chess games database and more...

Tags: chess, chess, play chess, chess online, play chess, chess, online backgammon

Chess Forum
uskidscompute.com << - < - > - >>

From	Message
Posted by erdite uskidscompute.com 11/27/2005 10:32:21 play online chess	Subject: What are the best pairs Message: Is it true that a pair of bishops is stronger than a pair of knights or does it depend on the position? ps: This is not helping me in any of my current games(I think) it is just somthing that has concerned me for a while.
Posted by luckypawn uskidscompute.com 11/27/2005 10:36:33 play online chess	I don't know which is better Message: I think it depends on the position. But a pair of knights would feel more comfortable for me.
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 11/27/2005 10:59:17 play online chess	Depends very much on position... Message: Though one rarely speaks of the 'knight pair' in the same way as a 'bishop pair'. In an open or even a semi-open position, the bishops can be devastating, working in cooperation. Many years ago, I 'sacrificed' a bishop pair, capturing knights on their c6 and f6 squares, leaving myself with a knight vs. bishop plus 6 pawns each. But ALL of Black's pawns were isolated, with doublets on the c- and f-files. My very pretty array lay all on the 2nd rank, 3 on each side. An easy win. So B-pairs aren't everything, even in an open position! Cheers, Ion
Posted by loreta uskidscompute.com 11/27/2005 22:36:44 play online chess	Just... Message: I looked to Gata Kamsky game: -> www.chessgames.com There Knight dominated Bishop...
Posted by mattdw uskidscompute.com 11/28/2005 01:45:51 play online chess	Message: I think it is a lot easier to contain knights (from my limited experience) if you have a pair, as you will know placing the bishop with a 2-square horizontal or vertical gap greatly reduces the moves options for the knight, this is obviously not always possible if you have the wrong colour bishop.
Posted by phaedrus81 uskidscompute.com 11/28/2005 12:20:49 play online chess	perspective Message: A bishop pair is definitely an advantage in anything but closed positions. But having the bishop pair, in itself, doesn't compensate for the loss of a pawn. Or for having many weaknesses and a passive position, obviously :) If the position otherwise looks balanced the bishop pair might tip the scales in the long run (if you play the right moves), but if you can barely cover all your weaknesses don't expect the bishops to magically save you.
Posted by eqj2 uskidscompute.com 11/28/2005 12:46:35 play online chess	Knights Message: I would take knights over bishops any time
Posted by sahsakkchess uskidscompute.com 11/28/2005 13:05:41 play online chess	Bishops,knights Message: Bishops are approximately equal in strength to knights. Bishops gain in relative strength towards the endgame as more and more pieces are traded, and lines open up on which they can operate. When the board is empty, a bishop can operate on both wings simultaneously, whereas a knight takes several moves to hop across. In an open endgame, a pair of bishops is decidedly superior to a bishop and a knight or two knights. A player possessing a pair of bishops has a strategic weapon in the form of a long-term threat to trade down to an advantageous endgame. On the other hand, in the early going a bishop may be hemmed in by pawns of both players, and thus be inferior to a knight which can hop over obstacles. Furthermore, on a crowded board a knight has many opportunities to fork two enemy pieces. While it is technically possible for a bishop to fork, practical opportunities are rare. You can reed more: -> mywebpages.comcast.net
Posted by bucklehead uskidscompute.com 11/28/2005 14:35:20 play online chess	If I had my druthers... Message: ...I'd prefer to have a pair of queens.
Posted by i_play_slowly uskidscompute.com 11/29/2005 00:26:05 play online chess	It does depend on the position, but, Message: all things being equal, there is a simple proof that 2 Bishops are stronger than two Knights: On an otherwise empty chessboard, two Bishops and a King can force checkmate; two Knights and a King can only checkmate if the opponent unwittingly cooperates. Any good book on endgames will illustrate this point. * It is often said that if you have the Bishop pair (and your opponent does not), your Bishops are worth 6.5 points.
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 12/01/2005 00:33:27 play online chess	Well... Message: ...now, there's a thing! Check out this ending I worked out once of an idle moment... Forsyte position: 7N/p4N2/8/8/8/8/2K5/k7 White to play and win. Mate in 8, I believe... Enjoy... Ion
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 12/02/2005 03:43:18 play online chess	I forgot to mention... Message: ...that the ending of my last is a K+2N vs K+P ending. The knights cooperate rather well, methinx. Cheers -
Posted by migchess20 uskidscompute.com 12/02/2005 06:57:33 play online chess	Opinion Message: Considero que es mas fuerte tener un par de alfiles que un par de caballos. Si analizan algunos partidos de grandes maestros, observaran que lo primero que hacen es tratar de cambiar alguno de los alfiles, para romper el equilibrio. Tambien en los finales, cuando van alfiles de diferente color, estos logran tablas. En posiciones completamente cerradas, es entonces excelente el par de caballos. La mayoria de finales pueden observar que ninguno de losjugadores termina con el par de alfiles. La mayoria de finales son 50% de finales de torres, despues de alfil contra caballo, al menos hasta la fecha no he visto un final de un par de alfiles contra un par de caballos jugado por grandes maestros. Muchos Saludos.
Posted by ccmcacollister uskidscompute.com 12/02/2005 09:41:40 play online chess	A pair of Message: PAwns on the 6th rank are always nice, but on the 7th a pure delight...
Posted by usethepawn uskidscompute.com 12/03/2005 17:36:07 play online chess	Bishops Message: Can move around the board easier and make it from 1 side to the other in virtually 1 move but for knights it takes a couple. I like the knights though because you can make come nice forks! I dont know which 1 i like more though it would depend on the position i guess 1 of each maybe?
Posted by tyekanyk uskidscompute.com 12/04/2005 03:11:42 play online chess	IMHO... Message: The pawn structure is a lot more imporatant than Bishops or Knights. If the centre is clear and there are equal pawns on both flanks, the Bishop will overpower the Knight. If the centre is fixed (White central pawn opposes Black central pawn ) the Knight is better. If there are pawns on just one side of the board the Knight will be better than the Bishop. Also as regarding to the Bishop pair the easiest way to demonstrate its efectivness is in Checkmating endgames. With two Bishops its very easy to checkmate, with a Knight and Bishop it's somewhat difficult and with two Knights it can't be done with correct play. For refference try seeing some Fischer games, or earlier Botvinnik's or if you like classics try seeing Akiba Rubinstein's endgames.
Posted by far1ey uskidscompute.com 12/05/2005 23:28:05 play online chess	Depends.... Message: If one or both of the Bishops are aimed straight at Blacks King side in a open or semi-open position they will easily be better then two knights.(Assuming he castles there). However one thing a hate about knights is when they are protecting each other especially in the centre of the board. When that happens they can only be removed by pawns, bishops or other knights without losing material.
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 12/06/2005 12:15:13 play online chess	Mutually protecting Knights... Message: ...form a tough nut to crack. But they also don't control many squares. Not a good attacking formation as a rule, unless one of the knights occupies a square that must hold a knight (i.e. after an exchange on that square, you maintain a knight there). Can be a useful defensive formation in some circumstances. I find I like them that way if I'm hanging on like grim death to save the game. }:-[
Posted by wolstoncroft1 uskidscompute.com 12/07/2005 17:13:13 play online chess	Need a translator?? Message: Here is my quick translation of migchess20's mesage above in english I consider the bishop pair to be stronger than a pair of knights. If you analyze some Grandmaster games, you would see that the first thing they do is try to change something in reguards the the bishops, in order to break the equilibrium. Also in Endgame's, when there are bishops of opposite colors, these games end in draws. If in a completely closed position, then a pair of knights is excellent. You can see that in the majority of endgames neither player ends up with a bishop pair. The majority of Endgames are 50% rook endgames, followed by a bishop versus knight. I at least have yet to see an endgame with a bishop pair versus a knight pair played by grandmasters. To all my very best The above was a translation of the earlier post in spanish I would like to add that you can achieve mate with two bishops against a king but not with two knights unless there is other material on the board.... I have read from many different authors that the bishop pair is a major consideration at the grandmaster level in as far as deciding exchanges and that the bishop pair is stronger especially as the game opens. Closed games the knight is definately better. But most chess authors rate the knight as 3 and the bishop and 3.25 including Bobby Fischer in his book 'Boby Fischer Teaches Chess' so having two bishops against two knights would give you a half pawn advantage plus the fact that in one of a thousand games you may find a way to mate with them..lol Good luck Keep the bishops unless you dont want to lose the tempo
Posted by ionadowman uskidscompute.com 12/09/2005 03:02:26 play online chess	Knights and Bishops... Message: ...It seems to me that knights cooperate better with pieces other than knights, unlike the others, which cooperate better with each other. E.g. Q+N is considered (broadly speaking) slightly stronger than Q+B in an endgame; and a N+RP will win where a RP+wrong bishop won't. On the other hand, a K+B+N vs K is a lot tougher to win than K+2B vs K. Ideas?
Posted by loreta uskidscompute.com 12/30/2005 06:59:30 play online chess	Knights pair Message: My game has 2 K "advantage" board #3562260 No comments on this game, please - it's in progress, yet.
Chess news: Magnus Carlsen closes in on Garry Kasparov's record chess rating -- Magnus Carlsen is closing in fast on Garry Kasparov's all-time record chess rating. The 19-year-old Norwegian scored an unbeaten 7.5/10 at Medias, Romania to take his score on the daily calculations up to 2826, just 25 points shy of the great Russian's peak mark. And Carlsen did it while still not in optimum form. He began with two draws, then took risks including a 1 e4 e5 2 f4 King's Gambit and a couple of dubious positions, but his inventiveness and will to win coupled with the growing Carlsen-fear of those on the other side of the chess board ensured another impressive outcome. Technically his most interesting game, certainly from the practical viewpoint of competition ... Impressive Field at World Open -- The World Open, the annual chess tournament in Philadelphia that always takes place around July 4th, often lives up to its name by attracting a world-class contingent of chess players. This year is no different as the field includes Francisco Vallejo Pons of Spain, Surya Shekhar Ganguly of India, Loek Van Wely of the Netherlands, Luke McShane of England, Evgeny Najer of Russia, Viktor Laznicka of the Czech Republic and Ilya Smirin of Israel. It also includes many of the best Americans, among them Gata Kamsky, the United States chess champion, and Alexander Onischuk. The players come because the tournament offers one of the biggest prize funds in the world. This year’s is ... Magnus Carlsen Survives on His Wits -- One of the reasons that Garry Kasparov was the world’s dominant chess player from the late 1980s through the ’90s was that he was better prepared than his competitors. He spent an enormous amount of time researching chess openings for new ideas to spring on his opponents, or he paid others to do it for him. Magnus Carlsen, currently the world’s top-ranked chess player, is beginning to be as dominant as Kasparov was, but it is not because of his preparation. He has described himself as a bit lazy, and so rather than play the most popular chess openings, which everyone has studied, he often chooses systems, particularly as White, that do not yield any advantage. Carlsen wants to ...