| From | Message |
Posted by masros uskidscompute.com
11/25/2004 08:34:55 play online chess | Subject: Is it true or not?
Message: Is it true or not?.A strong blitz player is also a strong player in longer time control and vice versa.
|
Posted by jjw109 uskidscompute.com
11/25/2004 11:14:47 play online chess | Probably true for some but not for others.
Message: Look at ICC for example--you'll see GMs with relatively low ratings, and non-GMs with really high ratings.
|
Posted by jollylolly uskidscompute.com
11/25/2004 15:24:29 play online chess | Probably !
Message: Probably !
|
Posted by bonsai uskidscompute.com
11/26/2004 02:42:29 play online chess |
Message: Certainly not entirely wrong, you have to know something about chess to do well at both long and blitz time controls, but different playing styles and attitudes (e.g. towards playing unsound moves) have different impacts at different time controls. And of course there's just some people that do not cope with time management in blitz games very well.
|
Posted by gunnarsamuelsson uskidscompute.com
11/26/2004 08:30:14 play online chess |
Message: Id say that 95% of all players could at least play good chess in both categories if they really made an effort to do so. If theyre not really old and actually function slower.
Then some players may play thousands and thousands of blitz games while others seldom blitz at all.
|
Posted by gunnarsamuelsson uskidscompute.com
11/26/2004 08:38:45 play online chess | not to be mistaken
Message: to games on this site or corr games at all that is a totally different thing then otb games.
|
Posted by honololou uskidscompute.com
11/27/2004 13:52:45 play online chess | I would guess…
Message: that there would be little correlation between one's ability at blitz vs. correspondence chess. Blitz
play rewards sharp lines and novel positions—things that most decent correspondence players can
refute with a little time and analysis. Really they are two totally different games.
|
Chess news:
World No1 Magnus Carlsen parts company with mentor Garry Kasparov -- The most significant chess news this month is a negative item. A carefully scripted and bland press release announced that the world No1, Magnus Carlsen, would make his own chess career decisions for 2010 and that he and the all-time No1, Garry Kasparov, would cease their regular training sessions launched early last year. The statement claimed that, with 19-year‑old Carlsen established at the world top, his cooperation with Kasparov had achieved its objectives ahead of schedule and that the Norwegian no longer needed constant guidance. Carlsen won his last two chess tournaments in London and Corus Wijk but displayed weaknesses and is as yet far from ...
Chess Grandmasters are getting younger -- Richard Rapport of Hungary just completed the requirements to become a chess grandmaster at age 13 years, 11 months, 15 days, the fifth-youngest ever. A thrilling accomplishment, no doubt. But chess fans have grown numb to the exploits of adolescent wonders. The inimitable Bobby Fischer stunned the world by becoming a grandmaster in 1958 at age 15 years, 6 months, a record that lasted until 1991. In the last two decades, though, 23 chess players have surpassed Fischer's mark. Sergey Karjakin, the Ukraine star who now plays for Russia, holds the current record at 12 years, 7 months. The World Chess Federation's March rating list includes ...
The f-pawn, part 5: is this a good position to push forward? -- It it time for black to use his f-pawn as a battering ram? We saw last week that advancing the f-pawn can leave you horribly exposed at the back if the attack stalls. Here Black has removed the knight from f6, clearing the way for the battering ram. Is it wise to advance the pawn to f5? RB When playing against 1 d4 I will often go for a Nimzo-Indian (as in the present chess game) or King's Indian. I have a liking for the kind of kingside attack that can arise – with certain key differences obviously – from both defences. With the centre safely closed, Black has ...
|