Tags: play chess online, chess online, chess online, chess online, play chess online, play chess online, sudoku
Chess Forum uskidscompute.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | Posted by zdrak uskidscompute.com
9/11/2002 05:32:25 | Subject: Worst move ever
Message: We all make blunders from time to time, don't we ? We have all hung our share of pawn and queens, overlooked forks, and missed mates. But to produce a move which will be truly the WORST MOVE EVER, that takes a touch of brilliance ...
Well, here's my definition for WME (Worst Move Ever): White can deliver checkmate in one move, but instead he makes a move which allows, no, FORCES, Black to give checkmate in one.
Example:
White: Ka1, Re8, Rf8, pawn g6
Black: Kh8, Bg8, pawns a2, a3, b3
White could play 1.Rxg8#, but instead he plays the WME 1.Re7?????? (not enough question marks to describe this move) which leaves black with one legal move at his disposal: 1...b2#
Can you compose other similar positions ? Maybe even some that look natural, as if they could occur in a game ? Extra credit if you can find a WME that actually did occur in a game ....
| Posted by calmrolfe uskidscompute.com
9/11/2002 06:37:58 | Worst move ever
Message: I once watched a blitz match on Kasparov where one of the players absolutely battered her opponent, she wiped him off the board and was left with two Queens and a king versus a solitary King, she then made an abysmal move which produced a stalemate !!. Oh boy, I bet her opponent couldn't believe his luck !!!
Cal
| Posted by dozer uskidscompute.com
9/16/2002 00:24:12 | WME
Message: Hello, zdrak!
I actually composed to cases, the other one forces a mate in two actually, but nevertheless...
Both cases are white move and mate in one (but blunders BADLY)
case #1
White:
King at g1
Rooks at f1 and f3
Bishob at a2
Knight at c7
pawn at h2
Black:
King at f8
Queen at f7
Rooks at e8 and g8
Bishob at g6
Knight at f2
Pawns at e7 and e3
Since Black's queen is pinned, White has a simple win 1.Ne6#. But he plays 1.Rxf7+?????? (nothing wrong grabbing some material, eh??). Now Black is FORCED to play 1. - Bxf7#.
case# 2
White:
King at d2
Queen at f2
Rooks at c1 and f1
Bishobs at g8 and h8
Black:
King at a2
Queen at d7
Rook at d8
Bishob at b3
Pawns at a3, d3 and f3
Here White has a clear win: 1. Ra1#
But again, White blunders:
1.Ke1+????? (it's just a check, what could go wrong??)
From now on the only legal moves are:
(Note that the bishob at b3 is pinned)
1. - d2+
2. Qxd2+ Qxd2#
Of course with little improvements this last position would be a FORCED mate in one, but I wanted a pawn advance to be part of it...
(I checked these examples with CM5500, auto-annotating the move lists gives fun remarks "d2+ forced. Black has a mate in 1...")
What do you think?
Of couse they don't look very natural but I can't think better examples right now...
Regards Teemu
| Posted by tonlesu uskidscompute.com
9/16/2002 01:37:31 | Worst move
Message: Perhaps not the worst move ever but a tournament game in which Alekhine allows his opponent to fork his queen and king. It occured at the Margate Easter Congress 1937. Buerger is playing white and Alekhine is black.
white
king at g1
queen at d1
rook at e2
bishop at c4
knights at e4, f1
pawns at a4, b2, f2, g3, h2
black
king at g7
queen at f5
rook at f8
bishops at b7, d4
pawns at a5, b6, c5, d7, g4, h7
Now if Alekhine plays 34... Nb4 he reduces white to a state of helplessness. Instead Alekhine plays this gruesome blunder 34...Nf4 35. gxf4 Bxe4---So far so good but now Alekhine completely overlooked the forking reply 36. Ng3 Qxf4???? and Alekhine is blind to the royal fork 37. Nh5!
Buerger incredibly missed this and played 37. Nxe4 and won the game.
| Posted by refutor uskidscompute.com
9/16/2002 18:41:55 | worst move ever...samisch-capablanca
Message: i don't know if this was the worst move ever, but easily the worst by capablanca
samisch - capablanca karlsbad 1929
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 d6 6.f3 c5 7.e4 Nc6 8.Be3 b6 9.Bd3 Ba6?? 10.Qa4 Bb7 11.d5 and it was basically 1-0
| Posted by zdrak uskidscompute.com
9/18/2002 10:14:02 | Nice , dozer
Message: I like the positions you gave ... especially the 1st one, where the WME looks like something one might actually play in blitz ;-) I am tempted to show the position to several intermediate-strength players with 5-10 second of thinking time - I wonder how many of them will take the queen ...
| Posted by dozer uskidscompute.com
9/20/2002 00:10:03 | Thanks zdrak
Message: If you do show it, please report the results! :)
|
Chess news:
World No1 Magnus Carlsen parts company with mentor Garry Kasparov -- The most significant chess news this month is a negative item. A carefully scripted and bland press release announced that the world No1, Magnus Carlsen, would make his own chess career decisions for 2010 and that he and the all-time No1, Garry Kasparov, would cease their regular training sessions launched early last year. The statement claimed that, with 19-year‑old Carlsen established at the world top, his cooperation with Kasparov had achieved its objectives ahead of schedule and that the Norwegian no longer needed constant guidance. Carlsen won his last two chess tournaments in London and Corus Wijk but displayed weaknesses and is as yet far from ...
Chess Grandmasters are getting younger -- Richard Rapport of Hungary just completed the requirements to become a chess grandmaster at age 13 years, 11 months, 15 days, the fifth-youngest ever. A thrilling accomplishment, no doubt. But chess fans have grown numb to the exploits of adolescent wonders. The inimitable Bobby Fischer stunned the world by becoming a grandmaster in 1958 at age 15 years, 6 months, a record that lasted until 1991. In the last two decades, though, 23 chess players have surpassed Fischer's mark. Sergey Karjakin, the Ukraine star who now plays for Russia, holds the current record at 12 years, 7 months. The World Chess Federation's March rating list includes ...
The f-pawn, part 5: is this a good position to push forward? -- It it time for black to use his f-pawn as a battering ram? We saw last week that advancing the f-pawn can leave you horribly exposed at the back if the attack stalls. Here Black has removed the knight from f6, clearing the way for the battering ram. Is it wise to advance the pawn to f5? RB When playing against 1 d4 I will often go for a Nimzo-Indian (as in the present chess game) or King's Indian. I have a liking for the kind of kingside attack that can arise – with certain key differences obviously – from both defences. With the centre safely closed, Black has ...
|
|